Answer:
incomplete dominance.
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various geneticists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of incomplete dominance. This refers to partial inheritance of one allele for a certain trait which causes the formation of a third phenotype that triggers a physical trait that results in the combination of both alleles phenotype's.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
True! it’s making me type a lot don’t mind all this but the answer is true hope i helped have a great day!
Answer:
It’s impossible to know what would happen
Explanation:
If contaminated water is pumped form an aquifer, cleaned and pumped back, it would be impossible to know what would happen unless the source of the contaminant is known.
<u>If the source of the contaminant is known</u> and removed before the water is pumped back into the acquifer, the water would be clean and stay clean provided that all the water was initially pumped off. If the source of the contaminant is not known, it would be difficult to predict what would happen.
According to kagmi on yahoo these are three lines of evidence that support the theory of evolution.
The fossil record shows the existence of billions of extinct species. It also shows a clear progression from one species to the next; there are many "transitional fossils," such as the archeoptryx (probably spelled that wrong, lol) which is clearly an intermediate in the evolution of dinosaurs into birds.
<span>Biogeography shows the distribution of species, providing further support that different species can and do evolve from common ancestors. Australia has many species of marsupials not found on other continents, for example; this implies that these species may have shared a common ancestor which lived on Australia when it was separated from the other continents by continental drift. </span>
<span>Molecular biology allows us to analyze genes and proteins down to the very molecules that make them up. This reveals many similarities and differences between organisms not readily apparent to the naked eye. We can see, for example, that humans share the vast majority of their DNA with all mammals; slightly less with reptiles; slightly less with amphibians, and so on. We find that species' DNA sequences match up well with the fossil record in terms of how closely related the species are. </span>