<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that he would have most likely "rejected" the demand, since he showed less and less patience for piracy throughout his administration, and was willing to use force. </span></span>
While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
Answer:
Japan modernized its government and economy
Explanation:
after commodore Perry visited Japan he threatened them into trading with America and forced them to have to modernize their government
I would say appeal based on logic. I'm not entirely sure, but that's what makes the most sense to me :)
National Grange of the Order of patrons of Husbandry
