1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
2 years ago
6

How did the tactics( the manner in which battles were conducted) help cause higher casualties with the use of the rifle musket?

History
1 answer:
madreJ [45]2 years ago
5 0

My answer would be that lines battles caused more casualties and were effective in ways. I don’t really know much about your question.

You might be interested in
What did the people say about Thomas Jefferson????
blagie [28]
Thomas Jefferson was the main writer of the Declaration of independence although he did not take any part in the American revolution part of the war he was recommended to write the document by George Washington and Benjamin Franklin
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best explains how the Democratic Party was formed in the 1820s?
kotykmax [81]

Answer:

Andrew Jackson felt betrayed by his loss in 1824 and wanted to create a political party for the "common people" ... The spoils system was debated long after Jackson's presidency has ended.

8 0
3 years ago
 What were the main weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation? What did these weaknesses mean for the national government?
natita [175]
They didn't have laws which made them have no power also they had a large debt due to the revolutionary war. Also no able to collect taxes. This weakness meant that the people had the power and the debt will get bigger and bigger
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is true for each of the participating European Union countries?
Vika [28.1K]
The answer will be (c)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During world war 1 it was a crime to criticize the president or the war effort. Would a court today find such a law as a constit
Lyrx [107]

Answer:

A court today would not find that to be constitutionally valid.

Explanation:

There is a multitude of laws that override the censorship of press, especially to criticize the president. When there are restrictions in free speech, citizens may feel as though they are being dis-empowered. The first amendment allows for free speech, and even if the sitting president feels that it may be harmful, they have no authority to stop free speech.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Demilitarized Zone between North and South Korea was established in
    12·1 answer
  • What would happen to industrialized nations’ economies if they did not expand their reach abroad?
    11·2 answers
  • Which strategy do companies use for their financial benefit?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the main goal of the National Child Labor Committee?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these best describe England interest establishing is what is now New York City
    12·2 answers
  • When Andrew Jackson became president in 1829, he placed many of his political supporters in government jobs. What is the term us
    13·1 answer
  • What is one thing the women’s rights movement accomplished?
    15·2 answers
  • Do the colonists have justification to declare independence from great britain ?
    6·1 answer
  • What were the factors that led to United States to follow the policy of<br> Imperialism?
    10·1 answer
  • Which states had few or no slaves in their population? In which region of the bayou ins were most of these states located
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!