I think the right answer would be intercultural
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Judge Fujita is sentencing a defendant who is convicted of a felony crime that carries a mandatory sentence of four years in prison. Judge Fujita sentences the defendant to a one-year sentence instead. The judge had the option to modify the sentence under the presumptive sentence.
The presumptive sentence serves as a guideline to the judge when sentencing. It is when the judge decides the appropriate sentence to a specific crime. The presumptive sentence contains the number of years in jail and the kind of fines the judge can dictate. To do this, the judge takes into consideration other factors such as the criminal record of the defendant and the aggravating factors.
The correct answer is: it is possible that an interest in politics caused Jessica to join the <span>political science club.
The argument in the question is flawed because it automatically assumes that Jessica's </span>involvement in her school's political science club led her to take an interest in politics, rather than the other way round, when in fact it is possible that an interest in politics is what actually caused Jessica to join the political science club. The argument in the question is flawed because it made a causal claim simply by an unfounded assumption.
Concurring opinion.
A concurring opinion is an opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with the decision and who the case went to, but may want to add to or comment on part of the decision. On the other hand, a dissenting opinion is by a judge who did not agree with the court decision, and writes down why he/she disagreed.
Answer:
A good is something you can use or consume.so i would say b or c
Explanation:
