The theory of ethics that the person who made the statement is likely appealing is; A: Egoism
<h3>What are the terminologies in colonialism?</h3>
The given statement about colonialism is that;
Colonialism is morally wrong because the greater good of
European settlers disproportionately outweighed the greater good
of the indigenous people."
Now, this statement is from a mind that feels their interests are being taken away by European settlers and as such this kind of thinking is referred to as Egoism which is an ethical theory that treats self-interest as the foundation of morality.
Read more about Colonialism at; brainly.com/question/12217366
#SPJ1
Answer:
The phrase "why of where" refers to the idea that explanation of spatial pattern is crucial.
Explanation: The phrase 'why of where' is to associate special importance to the elaboration and description of the spatial pattern of a specific place. The idea comes from the importance of detailing in the discipline of Geography. 'Why of where' simply means specifications and details of a given place in terms of its spatial pattern.
Hope this Helps!
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>nakakatulong </em><em>ito </em><em>UPANG </em><em>maibenta </em><em>Ng </em><em>MGA </em><em>NAGTATANIM</em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>UPANG </em><em>MAKATULONG </em><em>UPANG </em><em>SILA </em><em>AY </em><em>MAKAKAIN </em><em>KAHIT </em><em>PAPAANO.</em>
<em>3</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>NAPAPALAGO </em><em>NILA </em><em>ANG </em><em>KANILANG </em><em>TANIMAN </em><em>AT </em><em>NAKAKA </em><em>TULONG </em><em> </em><em>SILA </em><em>SA </em><em>IBA</em>
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy proclaimed that juveniles that are convicted even of the most heinous crimes should not be treated in the same way as adults. The court back in 2005 eliminated the capital punishment for juveniles and subsequently said that they could not be imprisoned for life for crimes other than murder and their hope living outside prison must be restored. Justice Kennedy also mentioned that, “children’s diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change” cast doubt on mandatory sentences, and that this “harshest possible penalty will be uncommon.”
The aforementioned change spread quickly across the nation, with individual state, where most juvenile justice issues are settled, which are using the same course of actions that are especially designed to rehabilitate juveniles, so much as the most grave cases. However, new change happened all over the United States when it comes to the treatment and arbitration of juveniles related to delinquency and criminal matters over the past twenty years
.
