For a corporation to be held criminally liable for the acts of an employee, the prosecutor does not have to prove that the employee was receiving a benefit from the criminal act.
Option e
<u>Explanation:</u>
An entity that exists only through its employees and their functions is called as an corporation. Although, a corporation may be held liable for various criminal activities, for example: the employee did that criminal act in the scope of employment, the failure in performing an affirmative duty.
Corporations must perform certain responsibilities and duties to which they are bound to, if unable to perform those duties, it may result in criminal liability. However, a criminally liable company's prosecutor does not have to prove that the "employee was trying to receive some benefit from the criminal act".
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The federal government created The 1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act to establish who can lobby and to whom and prohibits the contact between any big corporations such as Congress members or lawmakers.
I hope this helped!
Answer:
yes they can and will do that
Answer:
what do you need help with?
Explanation:
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
