1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ket [755]
3 years ago
15

When someone is accused of a crime does he have the burden to prove his innocence

Law
2 answers:
UNO [17]3 years ago
8 0
Not initially. Initially, the prosecutor bringing charges against the defendant has the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. There are instances when the burden of proof can shift to the defendant. For example, the defendant may have committed the alleged crime, but may present an affirmative defense (I.e., self defense, insanity, necessity). At this point, the defendant has the burden of proving the affirmative defense by a preponderance of the evidence (the fact in question is more likely than not to be true), clear and convincing evidence or another evidentiary standard depending on the jurisdiction and the affirmative defense.
bezimeni [28]3 years ago
7 0
Yes, hope this helped
You might be interested in
Which of the following is not provided by either the ACA or CAC?
Goryan [66]
I would say D because it’s just training it’s not Aca or CAC it doesn’t represent that
3 0
3 years ago
What is the author's argument? A) Youth voting makes sense to the author. B) Everyone wants their voice and opinion to count. C)
Airida [17]

Answer:

Last option

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
List three other way congress can limit the president ?
ikadub [295]
Killing him.... IM NEWWWWW
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone answer this pls
professor190 [17]

A. The Democratic Party

The Democratic Party:

- believes that the government should protect the environment

- supports increased domestic renewable energy development

- strives for equality of opportunity for all Americans

- more willing to intervene in the economy (i.e., regulate businesses)

7 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

The difference is that the original jurisdiction is where the case begins and the appellate jurisdiction is when the court reviews another court's decision.

Explanation:

Original jurisdiction refers to the right of the court to hear the case first and appellate jurisdiction refers to the right of a higher court to review a court's decision.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is rifling ? What two types of markings does this produce ?
    11·1 answer
  • Be prepared to slow or stop when you see a _________sign.
    5·2 answers
  • When turning left, watch for ____, who are frequently struck by left-turning vehicles.
    7·2 answers
  • Please help <br> What do you think the poster is saying?
    9·2 answers
  • Most of the personal rights and liberties enjoyed by australian citizens. True or False
    5·1 answer
  • Which situation best illustrates the economic concept of opportunity cost?
    8·1 answer
  • Which would be grounds for an appeal in a criminal case?
    7·2 answers
  • Charles wants to invest his money in something that earns money steadily
    12·1 answer
  • According to the supreme court which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters
    6·1 answer
  • According to this document (Document B), what causes a house where marijuana is being grown produce excess heat?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!