1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IrinaVladis [17]
3 years ago
9

1} What is the difference between civil law and criminal Law?

Law
2 answers:
alexandr1967 [171]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

here...

Explanation:

1- Criminal law cases are only conducted through the criminal court system. In contrast, civil laws deal with the private rights of individuals. Civil laws are applied when an individual has had his or her rights violated or when individuals have disputes with other individuals or organizations.

2- Intentional torts can allow for punitive damages, since society wishes to deter its members from intentionally harming each other. Proof of wrongful intent is required to recover. To recover in a negligence case, the person bringing the claim must have suffered actual harm as a result of the defendant's actions.

3- Keep a record of almost everything related. Keep it under scrutiny.

4-   Self defense and defense of others.

Defense of property.

Consent.

Necessity.

5-  When it comes to lawsuits, a defamation case can be very challenging. For example, unless you hire an attorney who works on a pro bono basis, this type of lawsuit can be costly. The reason for this is that to win, there is a lot of fact-finding involved, which often requires the assistance of an expert.

Art [367]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Civil law refers to law governing disputes between private parties. In civil cases, the plaintiff sues the defendant to obtain compensation for some wrong that the defendant has allegedly done the plaintiff.Criminal Law

It’s a crime to make unauthorized and harmful physical contact with another person (battery). In fact, it’s a crime even to threaten such contact (assault). Criminal law prohibits and punishes wrongful conduct, such as assault and battery, murder, robbery, extortion, and fraud. In criminal cases, the plaintiff—the party filing the complaint—is usually a government body acting as a representative of society.

Explanation:

I have no explanation sorry I hope this was helpful

You might be interested in
Why are task forces beneficial for long-term investigations of major cases?
stiks02 [169]

The correct answer is B; They allow multiple law enforcement agencies to combine their intelligence, resources, and personnel to target a specific problem.

Further Explanation:

Task forces are put together and used by numerous local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. There are many reasons this is done such as combining all the resources into one unit, having more personnel to work on the cases, and having more resources to get the cases solved. Task forces are put together for missing persons, murder cases, unsolved crimes, and drug cases.

When there is more than one jurisdiction involved the task force is more likely to be started. This is also beneficial for long term cases so that they don't have to work short staffed and have just the one case to focus on. Tasks forces will always have experts for different things so that the expertise is used to their advantage.

Learn more about task forces at brainly.com/question/12394318

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
What are the two things considered private in the Fourth Amendment with examples?
Firlakuza [10]
Surveillance and investigatory actions taken by strictly private persons, such as private investigators, suspicious spouses, or nosey neighbors, aren't governed by the Fourth Amendment.
6 0
3 years ago
Which term refers to team members who are available to augment the company in extreme circumstances when additional expertise an
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

the answer is "on call"

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Normally, both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual
Lubov Fominskaja [6]

It should be noted that in contract law, a discharge will take place when the parties that are involved have fully performed their duties. Therefore, it's <u>true.</u>

Discharge of a contract simply takes place when the main obligations of a contract end. It should be noted that the ending of the contract entails the termination of the contractual relationship.

Both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual obligations. Therefore, the operation of law releases the parties from performance.

Learn more about contracts on:

brainly.com/question/25820002

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain five grounds upon which a registrar can refuse to register partnership in Ghana
    14·1 answer
  • Mengapa kebebasan beragama berhubungan dengan hak asasi manusia (ham)? Sebutkan dan jelaskan!
    12·1 answer
  • Does a lawyer who has been practicing law in Colorado for 1 year moves to Minnesota, will he have to take the bar exam in Minnes
    5·1 answer
  • The Model Penal Code (MPC) provides that
    10·1 answer
  • In general, how has the power of the federal and the state governments changed over the course of the country's
    12·1 answer
  • ¿ en que consiste el código electoral ?
    10·1 answer
  • Science matter is everywhere
    14·1 answer
  • Anyone become my big sister please <br><br><br>myself Aditya Sharma age 16 standard 11 arts​
    13·2 answers
  • Explain the following phrase “Experience in government is an unwritten but important qualification.”
    5·1 answer
  • Accounting equation table with assets and owners equity​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!