Since there are <u>no words underlined</u> in the question, we can answer in the following manner:
- If the underlined group of words is supposed to be "<u>The labradoodle offers the best features of a lab and a poodle</u>," then the answer is main clause.
- If the underlined group of words is supposed to be "<u>which has quickly become one of the most desired dog breeds for those with pet allergies</u>," then the answer is adjective clause.
- A main clause is a group of words containing a subject and a predicate.
- A main clause can stand on its own as a sentence. That means it makes sense on its own; it does not need another clause in order to make sense.
- That is the case with "The labradoodle offers the best features of a lab and a poodle."
- An adjective clause is also a group of words that contains a subject and a predicate (at least a verb). It functions as an adjective in the sentence, modifying a noun.
- The difference here is that the adjective clause cannot stand on its own as a sentence. <u>It needs the main clause in order to make sense</u>.
- Adjective clauses often begin with relative pronouns such as "who", "which" or "whom".
- That is the case with "which has quickly become one of the most desired dog breeds for those with pet allergies."
- In conclusion, the answers given above are consistent with the options given in the question.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/15237798?referrer=searchResults
I'm pretty sure it would be C, he avoids sentimentality by simply describing the conditions in which enslaved people lived.... hope i helped:)
The latin translation is Verbum Dei. Jesu is another. Jesu = Jesus. Jesus is The Word.
I know this because I took Latin in 7th grade. :)
Answer:
C). Age 60 is no longer as old as it used to be; healthy pilots can continue
flying safely for many years after 60.
Explanation:
Counterclaims are primarily described as the claims that aim to offset or negate the original claim made by the author. It assists the author to provide another side of his argument and establish credibility.
As per the question, the third option asserts a claim which most appropriately negates the author's claim regarding the 'forced retirement of pilots over 60 years of age for the sake of passengers' safety.' It opposes this claim by asserting that age is not a factor but rather the health is and since 'age 60' has not remained similar to what it was earlier and thus, healthy pilots must be allowed to fly. This counterclaim logically denies the author's claim and offers a contrasting perspective to this claim regarding forced retirement. Hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.