Answer:
agressive
Explanation:
I think it is agressive, although i have not learned yet about japan. the qin dynasty ruled under legalism, where they were very agressive and had harsh punishments. they had lots of trade so it couldnt be isolationism, im not sure what open door policy is, and they DEFINENTLY were not friendly. In this case I feel like agressive is the best answer.
Answer:
idk im looking toooo but i need points sorry ('T-T)
Explanation:
The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the <u>right to petition.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the constitution is looked into, it is revealed that the right to access to the courts is nothing but one of the aspects of the First Amendment’s right to petition the government for redress of one’s grievances. This can be easily seen as it is stated here, similar philosophy governs the approach of groups or citizens to administrative agencies which can both be seen as creatures of the legislature, and limbs of the executive, and to all the courts which are the third branch of the government.
Thus, it is more than implied that the right of petition is extended to all departments of the government including the courts. Thus, making it an aspect of the "right to petition".
I'm pretty sure the answer is the cabinet. Hope this helps. I'm in the middle of a post test and had this question so I just gave it my best guess by using my notes to help a bit.
Hope this helps. Have a good day!
