Answer:
168.75
Explanation:
168.75 tall is the tree.
Please mark as Brainliest!!
Answer:
its very important to know your blood type because you could receive a blood type that is not compatible with yours and it can lead to clumping of blood that can lead to death
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
First blank: their small size
Second blank: distance from the sun
The concept of present value lets us know that the doggy estate worth in today's dollars is $180614.80
<h3>What is the present value of the doggy estate worth?</h3>
The concept of present value is significant because it enables investors to determine whether the amount they pay for an investment is reasonable. The present value of a future cash flow defines how much it is worth in today's value.
From the given information:
- The annual cashflow C = $20,000
- Interest rate (i) = 4.2% = 0.042
- Number of period (n) = 11
Thus, the present value of the doggy estate can be calculated by using the formula;
![\mathbf{PV = C \times \Big [ \dfrac{1 - \dfrac{1}{(1+i)^n}}{i}\Big] \times (1+i)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BPV%20%3D%20C%20%5Ctimes%20%5CBig%20%5B%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%20-%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%2Bi%29%5En%7D%7D%7Bi%7D%5CBig%5D%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2Bi%29%7D)
![\mathbf{PV = 20000 \times \Big [ \dfrac{1 - \dfrac{1}{(1+0.042)^{11}}}{0.042}\Big] \times (1+0.042)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathbf%7BPV%20%3D%2020000%20%5Ctimes%20%5CBig%20%5B%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%20-%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B%281%2B0.042%29%5E%7B11%7D%7D%7D%7B0.042%7D%5CBig%5D%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.042%29%7D)
PV = $180614.80
Learn more about how to calculate the Present value here:
brainly.com/question/15904086
In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
<h3>Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978)</h3>
In the ruling the supreme court ruled that the use of affirmative action programmes which allows the admission of minority applicants in the universities is a constitutional process in certain circumstances, while the use of racial quotas for the admission into universities was ruled as unconstitutional.
Hence we can conclude In the ruling by the supreme court in regents of the university of california v bakke ( 1978 ) : ( A ) affirmative action programs do not violate the constitution
Learn more Regents of the university of california v. bakke (1978) :brainly.com/question/412541
#SPJ1
