Hello there, thank you for the question! ^w^
The correct answer would be true!
"Why did we ban retroactive criminal laws? Because they undermine the "central values" of free societies. To allow this would threated the rule of law itself, it would become a rule of officials instead."
Have a great day! <3
answer:
there are positive and negative effects of communism on cuba. some include excellent free healthcare system, very little serious crimes, a pitiful transport system, poverty where the general population has to survive on less than a dollar each day.
explanation:
- cuba has had a communist political system since 1959 based on the "one state – one party" principle
- cuba is constitutionally defined as a marxist–leninist socialist state guided in part by the political ideas of karl marx, one of the fathers of historical materialism, friedrich engels and vladimir Lenin
Answer:
well what law are u asking for because Florida has specific laws
Answer:
Put simply, a criminal conspiracy is an agreement to commit an unlawful act. The agreement itself is the crime, but at least one co-conspirator must take an “overt act” in furtherance of the conspiracy. Under the federal conspiracy statute: The agreement by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.
Explanation:
Our question is this: What makes an act one of entrapment? We make a standard distinction between legal entrapment, which is carried out by parties acting in their capacities as (or as deputies of) law-enforcement agents, and civil entrapment, which is not. We aim to provide a definition of entrapment that covers both and which, for reasons we explain, does not settle questions of permissibility and culpability. We explain, compare, and contrast two existing definitions of legal entrapment to commit a crime that possess this neutrality. We point out some problems with the extensional correctness of these definitions and propose a new definition that resolves these problems. We then extend our definition to provide a more general definition of entrapment, encompassing both civil and legal cases. Our definition is, we believe, closer to being extensionally correct and will, we hope, provide a clearer basis for future discussions about the ethics of entrapment than do the definitions upon which it improves.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The state controls what a school is required to do in order to pass its students. The other 3 options are a matter of the federal govt aka it being national issues, which means the state govts have no control over those issues or topics
