Answer:
transparency of institutions
Explanation:
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?
-The union officials are pretending they have a closed shop and can't influence Ozzy's decision.
-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.
-Ozzy must now join the union because union shops are always legal.
-Ozzy's requirement to join the union depends on his state of employment.
Answer:
-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.
Explanation:
There is a law called the National Labor Relations Act that states that no employee should be required to be part of the union and that membership in the union should not be placed as a requirement for the occupation of a particular labor function. However, some states and some companies may adopt different approaches to their employees and the union.
In some states in the country, although an employee is not required to become a member of a union, they allow an obligation for all employees to be required to pay at least part of the union's dues. In this case, we can say that in relation to the case shown in the question above, the union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.
I’m not 100% sure but I believe this is how it should go, hope this helps. Distributive Policy: Benefits a large of group, aims to improve the public good, aims to solve major societal problems. Redistributive Policy: benefit a small group of people & uses tax revenue
Answer:
It underlines Ubuntu's compassion and empathy, and our courts should promote that principle through rehabilitation, taking into account the potential for reconciliation between an offender and the community. Still have questions?
Answer:
B. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child they are not allowed to claim Angela as a dependent.
Explanation:
Dasprop does not legally adopt Angela, but Sierra often refers to Angela as "her sister." Dasarupa is supportive of both the girls, no income is earned by the girl during the year, and both the girls remain in the Dasarupa residence.
There is no adoption process with four more ropes here because Angela, who lives with them, is not a legal guardian
so correct option is B. They may claim Siera as a dependent qualifying child they are not allowed to claim Angela as a dependent.
