Correlative thinking is a species of spontaneous thinking grounded in informal and ad hoc analogical procedures presupposing both association and differentiation.
Thinking that is logical or rational emphasizes the explanatory capacity of physical causes and is based on analytical, dialectical, and analogical argumentation. Chinese thought, in contrast, is based on an analogy type that may be referred to as "correlative thinking." In classical Chinese "cosmologies" as well as, less significantly, among the classical Greeks, correlative thinking refers to the correlation of image or concept clusters linked by meaningful disposition rather than physical causality.
A type of spontaneous thinking known as correlative thinking is based on impromptu and ad hoc analogical methods that assume correlation and difference. Instead of widely held beliefs about causal necessity, this mode of thought uses shared cultural and societal patterns as its regulative aspect.
To learn more about Chinese philosophies here,
brainly.com/question/13803986
#SPJ4
Answer:
More convinced that the evidence was insufficient.
Explanation:
According to the group polarization hypothesis, after the jurors deliberated, they would be<em> more convinced that the evidence was insufficient. </em>The group polarization hypothesis states that group decisions are more extreme than the initial thought of individual members. In this case, the jurors individually believe that there is insufficient evidence to convict the defendant. After deliberations, and due to the group polarization hypothesis they will be<em> more</em> convinced that the evidence is insufficient.
