The most sensible answer is to:
A) Report his findings.
As a scientist it is his job to conduct experiments based on hypothesis or theories and from this experiments, give a detailed description, explanation, and conclusion about the experiment. This is the reason scientists and doctors write articles about their research, to make the public aware of such discoveries so that future researchers don't have to spend time valuable time and further studies can be based on such experimental report.
D) Would also be correct 'If' the scientist didn't find the expected answer to his hypothesis. This would cause the scientist to perform further experiments to find a reasonable justification and give a conclusion about it. If by the end of his studies, the research concludes that his hypothesis is incorrect, he must change his hypothesis based on scientific truth.
Both B) and C) are the least likely answers because:
B) is an immature action to take, showing the scientists lack of control. Throwing away experiment notes is not the wisest move to take as these notes not only provide valuable information about the experiment but can actually prove to be important data, that if analysed well it could show the scientist his mistake/error, a new unobseved pattern or give him a new hypothesis or idea. Thus proving to be very valuable.
C) As a scientist, it is his right to be a very genuine about his work as he is given a credibility by science. Lie is one of the greatest sin to a scientist as it causes his credibility to collapse and even lose his title as a scientist.
Energy possessed by an object because of its position (in a gravitational or electric field), or its condition (as a stretched or compressed spring, as a chemical reactant, or by having rest mass). chemical energy
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think you can really tell. You need one more statement like
BC is equal to AM
Only then will the answer of 1/3 be right.
When describing a strange dream that you had, there are several ways to go about it and this is one:
- First introduce yourself into the story.
- Talk about how you fell asleep.
- Slowly guide the text into the dream.
- Talk about the different scenes in the dream and end it on the scene that felt the strangest to you.
- Explain why this was strange.
Writing an essay can be academic dishonesty so I will walk you through how to write one yourself.
<h3><u>Steps in the essay</u></h3>
Introducing yourself does not mean saying your name. You can simply use the pronoun, "I." Talk about what you were doing, for instance, walking home, or watching television.
Then talk about how you fell asleep - could be in your bed, on a seat on the bus, or even on a sitting room couch.
Then begin to talk about how the dream started. Talk about how the dream began and then progressed till you get to the strange events.
Talk about these strange events and end on the strangest; then explain why this scene was strange if it isn't apparent.
<h3><u>Conclusion</u></h3>
It is best to either use little detail or a lot of detail, avoid the middle ground.
Find out more on strange dreams at brainly.com/question/4295383.
Answer:
En matemáticas, el conjunto de los números reales (denotado por {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }\mathbb{R}) incluye tanto a los números racionales, (positivos, negativos y el cero) como a los números irracionales;1 y en otro enfoque, trascendentes y algebraicos. Los irracionales y los trascendentes2 (1970) no se pueden expresar mediante una fracción de dos enteros con denominador no nulo; tienen infinitas cifras decimales aperiódicas, tales como: {\displaystyle {\sqrt {5}}}{\sqrt {5}}, π, o el número real: {\displaystyle log(2)}{\displaystyle log(2)}, cuya trascendencia fue enunciada por Euler en el siglo XVIII.2
Los números reales pueden ser descritos y construidos de varias formas, algunas simples aunque carentes del rigor necesario para los propósitos formales de matemáticas y otras más complejas pero con el rigor necesario para el trabajo matemático formal.
Durante los siglos XVI y XVII el cálculo avanzó mucho aunque carecía de una base rigurosa, puesto que en el momento prescindían del rigor y fundamento lógico, tan exigente en los enfoques teóricos de la actualidad, y se usaban expresiones como «pequeño», «límite», «se acerca» sin una definición precisa. Esto llevó a una serie de paradojas y problemas lógicos que hicieron evidente la necesidad de crear una base rigurosa para la matemática, la cual consistió de definiciones formales y rigurosas (aunque ciertamente técnicas) del concepto de número real.3 En una sección posterior se describirán dos de las definiciones precisas más usuales actualmente: clases de equivalencia de sucesiones de Cauchy de números racionales y cortaduras de Dedekind.
Explanation:
