Both A and C would be solutions to the equation.
In order to solve for this you must first get the equation equal to 0.
2x^2+5x+8=6 ----> subtract 6 from both sides
2x^2 + 5x + 2 = 0
Now knowing this we can use the coefficients of each one in descending order of power as a, b and c.
a = 2 (because it is the coefficient to x^2)
b = 5 (because it is the coefficient to x)
c = 2 (because it is the end number)
Now we can plug these values into the quadratic equation.
or -1/2 for the first answer
or -2 for the second answer
To answer this item, we take the differential of the equation and equate to zero.
C(x) = 0.8x² - 256x + 25939
Differentiation,
dC(x) = 1.6x - 256
dC(x) = 1.6x - 256 = 0
The value of x from the derived equation above is 160.
Thus, the number of machine to be made in order to minimize the cost should be 160.
Answer:
1. Number 1 and 2 and 4 is a function, 2. number 1 is a function
Step-by-step explanation:
1)To know if it's a function or not run vertical lines through multiple places of the graph. If it is a function every single time you do the vertical line test it should only go over the line once. If you do the vertical line test on 3 you will see that it went over the line on the graph, so we know not a function. Graphs 1, 2, and 4m however, are different, when you do the vertical line test on those graphs it only goes over them once.
2) Choice (1) is a function because when drawing vertical lines through the graph it only goes over one.
Choice (2) is not a function because when drawing vertical lines through the graph it covers two points on the graph.
Choice (3) is not a function because when drawing vertical lines through the graph it goes over multiple points.
Choice (4) is not a function because when a vertical line is drawn, it goes over more than one point on the graph.
The vertical test is a way to determine if it is a function.
When looking at a table functions are one-to-one and many-to-one
Non-functions are one-to-many and many-to-many
Hoped this helped you : )
Answer:
idk
Step-by-step explanation:
idk
