1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iris [78.8K]
2 years ago
8

How did gorbachev’s policies affect soviet society?

History
1 answer:
xenn [34]2 years ago
7 0
They enabled the fall of the soviet union. The countries that weren't Russia started wanting their independence and a turn towards the western world. The Russians got more free speech and a more free economy but this led them to rebellion and riots because they wanted a full democracy instead of a communist country.
You might be interested in
Persia was located between the middle east and?
Alexus [3.1K]

Between the Middle East and Central Asia. 

Ancient Persia, which is often known as an enemy to the Greek states through the Greeco-Persian wars, was to be found on the area of modern day Iran (but extended much more and covered an area that is more vast than modern day Iran). Therefore, the other answers would be incorrect. Great Britain is way to far, Russia and Africa are closer but still not close enough. 

mark brainliest  :)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Arabian Peninsula’s location affect ability to trade?
Stella [2.4K]
"<span>c. Its proximity to Africa and India made trade quite successful" is the best option, since a great deal of trade during this time and indeed today is done with ships. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which economic terms can be used to measure changes in the global economy? Select four options.
Butoxors [25]
I think the answer is b
4 0
3 years ago
The great depression affected nations around the world by
grin007 [14]

Answer:

Decreasing international trade, increasing tax, and increasing unemployment rates

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How old is George Washington​
    11·2 answers
  • Hey is it easier to supply slaves today than in colonial America?
    12·2 answers
  • What did the British do to Washington D.C.? ruined it improved it bombed it built it
    14·1 answer
  • 1. How did whites limit the power of blacks in the south?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did people in rural areas violate the one couple one child policy
    11·2 answers
  • Malaria is caused by a .___
    11·2 answers
  • Which policy below is Washington wanting America to follow? *
    8·1 answer
  • Place in order from highest caste to lowest caste.
    10·1 answer
  • What is a trial with no jury is called?
    9·2 answers
  • What did imperialism have om the united states in the late 1800s and early 1900s
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!