Answer:
The driving force was Economics; the need for resources and technological advances.
Explanation:
Europeans took over Africa in the 18's. The Scramble For Africa then make the European to enslave Africans and took all their resources.
It all started because of Europeans' competitions. In order to be better than their neighbor in the continent(Europe), Europeans needed ''more'' riches.
Europeans wanted Africa resources such as rubber. For England, they only want more power but Germany want to compete and beat the ''English'' people.
So, the Europeans main driving force is Economics.
Hai :3
I answered this question before, if you look it up.
What Samuel Adams is trying to say is that, if the British parliament is going to tax on the American colonists, then the colonists should have a say on the parliament when it comes to both taxes and laws.
This is where the famous phrase "NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION" comes from.
American colonists wanted independence due to this unfair treatment that the British gave to the colonists, as well as no say in Parliament.
Cheers!
-10th Grader Snow
The earliest Chinese people did not have to worry about invasions from foreign countries because of their strong army and geography. The Chinese army present in ancient times were very strong and able to defend their lands. Chinese also build china wall in order to protect their lands from the invasion of other people. The geography of china also made difficult for the invaders to capture china.
Population was not a direct cause of American Revolution but if we look from the point of population growth and associate this growth with Taxes and growing unity among the colonists we can say that the increase in population was another reason for the American Revolution. <u>The answer will be The population had grown quickly.</u>
Answer:
In the substantially revised fourth edition of this widely-used book, Norman Barry provides a comprehensive introduction to contemporary political theory including systematic coverage of the philosophical background to contemporary debates between liberals, conservatives, communitarians, socialists, and feminists
