<em><u>Hey</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em><em><u>!</u></em>
<em><u>Here</u></em><em><u>'s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u>our</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u>:</u></em>
<em><u>Mandamus</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u>a writ issued by a superior court commanding the performance of a specified official act or duty</u></em>
<h3>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>will</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>help</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h3>
<em><u>~</u></em><em><u>P</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>g</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u>a</u></em>
False! They cannot EXCEED their maximum amount!
Wait what are the punishments?
Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
