Answer:
<h3>a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.</h3>
Explanation:
- Long-arm statutes are laws that allow state courts to acquire automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. The courts can apprehend an out-of-state defendant based on certain actions which have connections with the concerned state.
- The provisions of a long-arm statute normally grants a state court the right to jurisdiction over a non-state domicile if the individual has minimum connection within the state's court jurisdiction.
Answer:
The two-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict envisages an independent State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel, west of the Jordan River.
Explanation: i think dats it
Answer:
This is a very controversial topic, The First Amendment states that we are given the freedom of expression, Some say that the Burning of the American flag is considered as expressing yourself, and thus, should be protected. This was written in Texas V.S. Johnson, which based their opinion on the opinion of the cases Stromberg v California, and Tinker v Des Moines, which showed t that non-verbal expression was still protected under the 1st amendment.
The role Stare decisis role in weberry v Sanders decision is that it help the court to rule using the existing Constitution. The court had to follow it doctrine.
<h3>Stare Decisis role</h3>
Stare decisis refers to Court's doctrine which is taking into consideration before making their decisions. Stare decisis means “to stand by things
In 1963, James P. Wesberry lived in a Georgia congressional district which had higher population than thecongressional districts in the state. He said that is vote did not count and is not rendered value d because there was only one member of
Congress for each congressional district because the state failed to adjust.
For the congressional districts to meet the changing population. Wesberry sought for ways inorder to prevent Georgia government from conducting elections under the current form of district system. The district court dismissed his complaint, He then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court opinion and vadity was that congressional districts must have almost equal populations compare to each other. The court further held that the state apportionment statute was invalid because it did not follow the Constitution.
Therefore, The role Stare decisis role in weberry v Sanders decision is that it help the court to rule using the existing Constitution. The court had to follow it doctrine.
Learn more about stare Decisis from.the link below.
brainly.com/question/1673584
