Answer:
D. It would be impossible for employer prejudice to exist in a firm that sells its output in a competitive market unless all rivals also discriminate.
Explanation:
In a competitive market , efficiency of employee is the only factor that is taken into account to meet the challenges of the market . The employer can not afford the cost of being prejudiced against a staff because it only has deleterious effect on the morale of the employee. So in a competitive market ,there is no scope for employer's prejudice.
Answer:
The expected ending balance on November 30 will be $134,500
Explanation:
Sales Collected (165,000*70%) $115,500
Expenses paid ($36,000)
Cash Opening $55,000
Cash ending Nov 30 $134,500
<span>A petition that, if signed by a majority of the members of the House of Representatives, will pry a bill from committee and bring it to the floor for consideration.
A discharge petition!</span>
When new technology for the more efficient production of peanut butter was implemented, the supply curve for peanut butter <span>shifted to the right. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. I hope that this is the answer that has come to your help.</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. Holding period return would be
= Income + (End of Period Value - Initial Value) ÷ Initial Value
= 0 +($2,178 - $1,902) ÷ $1,902
= 0 + $276 ÷ $1,902
= 14.51%
b. The annual percentage rate is
For 3 months, the rate is 14.51%
Now
For 12 months, it is
= 14.51% ÷ 3 × 12
= 14.51 % × 4
= 58.04%
c. The effective annual rate is
= ( 1 + r ÷ m)^m - 1
= (1 + 58.04% ÷ 4)^4 - 1
= (1 + 0.5804 ÷ 4)^4 - 1
= (1 + 0.1451)^4 - 1
= (1.1451)^4 - 1
= 1.719387079 - 1
= 0.719387079 or 71.94%
