Answer:
Rohan- Hii Rahul
Rahul- Hii nice to meet you
Rohan- why are you not looking from too many days?
Rahul- I am busy from several days
Rohan- Busy but for what not our exams are being held now.
Rahul- Not for exams but for online classes.
Rohan - oh yes my online classes are also going on but it does not make me much busy
Rahul- But there are so much homework that it takes the whole day to complete.
Rohan - No it does not take the whole you just solve it during the period when there is nothing going on , and it will be much easier for you.
Rahul- oh yes you are right I will follow it thank you. Byee
Rohan - Byee and have a nice day
Answer:
theres really nothing bad about him most of the time he uses his public platform like on his song the bigger picture and multiple others the only bad thing is his criminal history but that’s in the past
Explanation:
Answer:
Your topic usually makes a statement (like a thesis statement), right? To support your topic, you give examples and evidence. But here's what it means to tie evidence into the topic: you have to have a clear link or transition between topic and evidence or example. The link can be keywords or phrases that show the connection between statement to supporting evidence.
Example: If my topic is "Dogs are loud," and my evidence is that dogs bark, then I need to prove that dogs bark <em>loudly.</em> (Let me pull some numbers out of thin air here.)
I could state, "Dogs produce noise levels that are unsafe for human ears within a proximity of ten meters," and support that with: "Dogs produce high levels of vibrations when they bark. On average, a dog's bark is no quieter than 50 decibels, and can get as loud as 100 decibels. These levels of volume cause ever-so-much-any-number-will-do damage to the human ear when heard from within ten meters distance." (fake numbers)
In this example, my example and evidence are intertwined in my stated average volume of dog barks and the damage that allegedly causes (it's fake evidence ok). I can explain the tie by also stating, "This amount of damage to the ear is unsafe because it is irreparable, causes great pain to the human, and may lead to them going deaf." (None of which is true... I think.) Can you see the tie? If not I can try another explanation.
Answer:
Maybe they lied because they wanted people to think they were good at something, and they wanted people to be they'er friend.
Explanation:
1. one of the men is the commander the other is the stranger
2. I think it is so that way there is a slight origin to where the story came from.
3. I think Rip's long sleep is a punishment cause the world has changed and twenty or so years have passed.
4. Rip has a "meekness of spirit" this is blamed from the nagging of his wife.
5. One other character I can think of that sorta compares to Rip van Winkle is Ichabod Crane
6. I think Rip is consistent with his actions
7. The Inn, The flagon drink, and The union hotel
8.
9. It's probably not to realistic sense the author has never really been to it
10. So that way he would wake up at the perfect time of the civil war.