Answer:
1. economics a. restricted to examining material goods
2. philosophy e. development and culture of man
3. political science f. principles of government
4. psychology d. studies individuals
5. history b. recording major events of the past
6. anthropology c. studies truth and knowledge
This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read the article 'Conservation, history collide with North Carolina’s wild horses,' By Laura Beil.
The author includes a fact about a 2-week-old colt that died of an intestinal blockage. How does this fact contribute to the author’s purpose?
Answer:
Laura Beil´s fact about horses dying after being fed by tourists contributes to the idea of tourism being the most dangerous menace for the Corolla herd.
Explanation:
This adds to the point of how much there´s to think about the disagreement between wildlife conservationists, which seems to be based solely on their genetics, their habitat, and whether or not they are harmful to the environment.
Coronavirus is bad so don’t get it
A/ tell a story. Hence the term, "narrate."
Answer:
Based on word choice, Giblin feels:
B. that it was worthwhile.
Explanation:
We can easily eliminate options A and C, since there is nothing conveying a negative connotation in the excerpt. We are left with options B and D.
Let's take a look at option D first. It says Giblin thinks the process of obtaining copies of the stone was amazing. However, that is not what the word choice conveys. Had there been words such as "fantastic" or "incredible" in the excerpt, this option would have made sense. But that is not the case.
<u>Option B is the only correct one. The excerpt uses words such as "fortunately", "good", and "clear". Those words convey the idea that the process the French used was worthwhile. It not only worked, but worked well, effectively.</u>
