1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
3 years ago
10

How does the articles of confederation compare to the constitution?

History
1 answer:
olga_2 [115]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Easy! I got you!

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first written constitution of the United States. Along those lines, this constitution had some weaknesses such as:

*Each state only had one vote in Congress, regardless of size

*Congress did not have the power to tax

*Congress did not have the power to regulate foreign and interstate commerce

*There was no executive branch to enforce any acts passed by Congress

The Articles of Confederation compares to our current constitution because our current constitution has fixed ideas that the Articles of Confederation didn't. When the Articles of Confederation was ratified to be replaced, our new constitution came into place at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

You're welcome! Hope this helped!

You might be interested in
What was the first goverment of united states
Alja [10]

Answer:

Articles Of Confederation!

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did diseases like smallpox affect Indians so badly?
uysha [10]

Indians had no immunity to European diseases

This fact was one of the main causes for the decimation of the Native American population. The Indians simply never encountered the European diseases and their bodies had not antibodies to fight them off.

Hope this helped!

~Just a girl in love with Shawn Mendes

7 0
3 years ago
How would the result of World War II have been different if the South would have won the Civil War, dividing America into two di
Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

The Nazis win and a weak Nazi regime would be established.

Explanation:

The Southern Embargo on cotton led Britain and France to become less reliant on American cotton. Colonies like India and Egypt decreased Britain and France's reliance on American cotton, which was a staple of the Southern economy. The South emerged economically devastated, and had a long recovery. But if they did not return to the Union, and they could not rely on Northern industry, this recovery would be even slower. And with the division, both parts of the union would be significantly weaker. For this reason, America would have played a less significant role in WWII. The result is speculative of course, but it's possible that if America decided not to enter, or could not produce a strong army, then the Nazis would have had a much easier time with their goal. I think that the only scenario where the Nazis would have won is an instance where they developed nuclear bombs first--and used a scorched Earth strategy to eliminate the Russian threat. This would be my speculation, but past victory, it's hard to say what would have happened. The Roman Government lasted for thousands of years, and perhaps the Nazi regime could last for a while before becoming de-stabilized, but I don't think it would have been a strong centralized regime. The reason I say this is because not even Caesar or Napoleon (brilliant diplomats and military strategists) could not achieve this. But this (of course) is speculative.

(Fun question, never done "hypothetical history")

3 0
2 years ago
Answer the following question in two to three complete sentences. (Each question is worth three points)
olga55 [171]

Answer:

Slave rebellions were a continuous source of fear in the American South, especially since black slaves accounted for more than one-third of the region’s population in the 18th century. Laws dictating when, where and how slaves could congregate were enacted to prevent insurrection and quell white paranoia. It’s estimated there were at least 250 slave rebellions in America before slavery was abolished in 1865.

Explanation:

lol

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2018.
saul85 [17]

Answer:

I believe the answer is C) The United States has a trade deficit with China

Please correct me if I'm wrong, I hope I helped!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Countries engage in proxy wars in order to:
    14·2 answers
  • What caused the discovery of the grave of qin ahi Jiangxi chinas first emperor
    5·1 answer
  • what was the reason one reason the united states goverment gave subsidies and land grants to railroad companies onthe 1800
    6·1 answer
  • In the Iran–Contra Affair, why were weapons sold to Iran, which was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984? Check all t
    10·2 answers
  • This was the adaptation of Chinese culture in Korea and Japan, but was less typical in Viet Nam.
    10·1 answer
  • Anyone have the answer to this question??
    11·1 answer
  • Based on these writings, is there anything we can say for sure about the influence that Teotihuacan had on classic Maya society?
    11·1 answer
  • **What was the role of the Rough Riders?
    14·1 answer
  • Quien fue el primer gobernador de lima?
    10·1 answer
  • What caused South Carolina to secede from the Union ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!