This is an opinion, you cant get it wrong try doing it yourself in your own words. Focus on what the question is asking of you and then do your best to answer accordingly.
I believe it is A. religious wars and conflicts related to the beliefs of the two largest faiths.
Religious freedom and people worshiped in different way. The people in all the ancient Greek city states believed in the same gods and worshiped in the same way. They were not forced to believe they simply believed in them. They spoke the same language. That had a common culture their love of beauty and competition to name two. Their city states were located on the same peninsula.
Hello Martincoretox9aum, an earl is a member of the nobility. The title is Anglo-Saxon in origin, akin to the Scandinavian form jarl, and meant "chieftain", particularly a chieftain set to rule a territory in a king's stead. In Scandinavia, it became obsolete in the Middle Ages and was replaced by duke (hertig/hertug/hertog). In later medieval Britain, it became the equivalent of the continental count (in England in the earlier period, it was more akin to a duke; in Scotland it assimilated the concept of mormaer). However, earlier in Scandinavia, jarl could also mean a sovereign prince.<span>[citation needed]</span> For example, the rulers of several of the petty kingdoms of Norway had the title of jarl
and in many cases they had no less power than their neighbours who had
the title of king. Alternative names for the rank equivalent to
"Earl/Count" in the nobility structure are used in other countries, such
as the hakushaku of the post-restoration Japanese Imperial era.In modern Britain, an earl is a member of the peerage, ranking below a marquess and above a viscount. A feminine form of earl never developed; instead, countess is used.
The answer to that question is A
