Answer: matching , it was correct on edge
Explanation: hope that helps ! ^^
<u><em>It’s our responsibility as citizens to practice and show wisdom, justice and moderation in our actions of everyday life. </em></u>
<u><em>Our right is obtaining justice for our actions.</em></u>
Answer:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
Explanation:
There are some critiques to the Evolutionary Theories, among them: Biological Deterministic way of seeing the Hominideos and in many ways reductionist, to make it complex things simpler.
Analyzing the options then:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
These theories were not able to fulfill a model of predicting the future, leaving it blank for speculations. Also, it does not provide a cohesive and coherent basis model to predict the Post Homo Sapiens' future.
Despite those and other criticisms, this hasn't been enough to discard the Evolutionary Theories. On the other hand, the criticisms should be open for the sake of science.
Answer:
Moral outrage.
Explanation:
In the case of any wrong and unfortunate event, the victims always demand and expect justice to be given to them for the pain and suffering they were made to go through. Same case for a murdered parent and the expectation of giving a just punishment to the culprit for the crime.
In wanting death for the killer, the parent's want reflects the punishment goal of moral outrage. This is an emotional reaction stemming from the injustice that has been done or given to them. The feeling that the killer deserves the punishment is, to them, a moral judgment, rightly deserved and also will give them a sense of satisfaction in knowing that their child's killer got his/ her due.