Experiments with faulty design or inconsistent data:
-decreases the experiment's reliability and validity
- wastes time and resources
- destroys the scientist's credibility in their field
- may lead to issues of safety to the experimenter/s due to faulty design
- is discouraged especially in hard sciences where data obtained should be accurate and precise
Explanation:
There are many<span> reasons that experiments with faulty </span>styles<span> or with incorrect </span>knowledge are<span> problematic for scientists. One reason for them to be problematic </span>is that if<span> he or she were to poorly </span>live<span> what </span>they're learning<span>. </span>as an example<span>, </span>somebody<span> measured the mass of a book </span>properly<span> to be </span>two<span> pounds, and </span>somebody else<span> measured it </span>erroneously<span> to be </span>one<span> pound. </span>differently<span>, that faulty designed experiments and inconsistent </span>knowledge will be<span> problematic is lack of accuracy and </span><span>exactness.</span>
Time
Explanation:
it changes over time because it changes the organism over time
In the adults, the growth rate slows with age. The healing mechanism of the different cells if damaged is different than that of the younger ones. If a cartilage is damage in the adults, the chondrocytes which are still surviving secrete more extracellular matrix in order to heal the damaged cartilage. The chondrocytes cells are present in the cartilage, and they function to maintain the cellular matrix of the cartilage.
It says its small on google
