1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
storchak [24]
2 years ago
11

Vietnam War Veteran Karl Marlantes said, "That changed our whole attitude toward government. Up until then, the president wouldn

’t lie. After then, they always lie." Do you think this is a fair assessment? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
NikAS [45]2 years ago
3 0

This is not a fair assessment because it is a generalization about the other presidents due to an event that happened a long time ago and that does not involve them.

The Vietnam War was a warlike confrontation that occurred in the territory of Vietnam in which two sides faced each other. On one side were the North Vietnamese who had a Communist ideology, while the South Vietnamese had a Capitalist ideology.

This confrontation involved several foreign countries such as the Soviet Union and the United States. In the case of the United States, many American citizens rejected the idea of ​​involving the country in an alien confrontation because it had not affected American interests.

The president of the United States did not take into account citizen requests not to get involved in this confrontation and lied to be able to get involved in it. From that moment the credibility of the government is lower.

The credibility of the next government was also affected because now citizens believe that the rulers are lying. This conception is wrong and unfair because the management of all the presidents and public servants cannot be generalized due to the wrong action of one of them.

Therefore, I believe that it is not a fair evaluation that is expressed by the war veteran Karl Marlantes because he is generalizing about all the rulers because of what one of them has done.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/11375126?

You might be interested in
Some please help will mark brainllest for the correct answer please help I beg of you
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

Uyguyuyguyguyg

Explanation:

Uguyguy

7 0
3 years ago
Help pls! Asap!! ⚠️⚠️
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

No one is above the law, and everyone under the authority of the constitution is obligated equally to obey the law.

Have a great day! :)

8 0
3 years ago
Describe the causes and consequences of conflict between settlers and American Indians in early Washington history. Use research
Nata [24]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The major causes of conflict between settlers and American Indians in early Washington history were:

1. Disputes over lands and resources in 1885 in which the American government(the white settlers) wanted the Nez Perce tribe to move to Oregon’s Umatilla Reservation with the Walla Walla, Cayuse, and Umatilla tribes.

2. Also, Territorial Governor Isaac Stevens went against the agreement that the white miners and settlers would not be allowed to encroach tribal lands before relocating to their reservation location.

Some of the consequences of the conflict between settlers and American Indians in early Washington history are:

1. Yakima war between 1855 to 1858, in which there series of battles like battle of walla walla and the battle of settles

2. White River Massacre in 1885

6 0
3 years ago
After Alexander the Great’s death, the empire that he had built stayed strong.
Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

The answer is False.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This is from the book "Outsiders"
user100 [1]
1.The theme of belonging is that all people in society want a sense of belonging. The greasers don't really belong anywhere, except for their gang. Their gang is like a family and gives them a sense of belonging and purpose.
2. The Outsiders demonstrates that society really cares about and judges people based on their appearance. We also group people based on stereotypical appearances.
3.Dallas and Johnny are both heroic because they both saved people at the cost of themselves.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were the battles on the islands of Iwo Jima and Okinawa significant to the Americans?
    7·1 answer
  • In addition to federal income tax, many people also pay corporate tax. state income tax. local medicare tax. local social securi
    10·2 answers
  • In the 1850’s the phrase “Bleeding Kansas” was used to describe clashes between
    5·1 answer
  • Why were so few books available during the Middle Ages?
    12·2 answers
  • Columbus and other Europeans of his time believed that the Earth was
    12·2 answers
  • What aspect of the Modernist period inspired writers and artists to break from traditional forms?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the Court's opinion in the Cherokee Nation case differ from Worcester?
    8·2 answers
  • When did the english arrive in America?
    13·2 answers
  • What was 2 reasons for the taliban to shoot malala<br> will give brainliest
    8·1 answer
  • Use the drop-down menus to complete each sentence.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!