Which statement most reveals the speaker's bias?
A. Students at the college are not happy about increased tuition.
Answer:
C. A 3x2 between-subjects, factorial design
Explanation:
Here a factorial design needs to be considered. Factorial design is used when there is more than one independent variable or factor which has more than one level. Here, noise is independent factor with three levels which are high, medium, and low and caffeine has two levels which are no caffeine or a high level of caffeine. Also, participants have received either no caffeine or a high level of caffeine. This means that it is a between-subjects or between-groups study with one group having no caffeine and other having high caffeine. Hence, 3x2 between-subjects factorial design is the most appropriate here.
Answer:
its a science that makes human dumb
Explanation:
it has toooo many nonsenses in it
Answer: No
Explanation: Freedom of speech is a constitutional guarantee. But that doesn't mean it is absolute or not subject to some limitations. In a free society, however, the burden of proof should be on those who would curtail speech to prove that a particular form of expression would seriously encroach on other individual rights or create a health or safety risk.
Therefore, No I do not think we should have unlimited rights.
I Really hope this helps!
Answer:
Extensive social regulation may have an anticompetitive effect.
Explanation:
Social regulation refers to a series of public policies, rules, and laws, implemented by a government that try to determine or influence some economic or social activities. Social regulations are often used with specific goals in mind, such as promoting equality, restrict harmful practices, and protect certain sectors of the population, the environment, etc. However, a side effect of regulatiosn is that they might have an anticompetitive effect. That is, they can discourage private activity because the costs of abiding by the regulations might be seem as too high by some actors, thus preferring to stand aside; also, regulations can distort free markets, leading to distortions in prices and misallocation of resources. On the other hand, often times the costs of social regulations are often easier to measure than their benefits. This is because the costs can be directly measured by the amount of money regulations costs to the government and enterprises, while benefits are more often than not indirect, so there are no immediate indicators for how beneficial regulations can be.