Answer: It was the imaginary line dividing Europe between the Soviet Union and Western influence.
Explanation: This symbolized efforts by the Soviet union to block itself from open contact with the West
Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
The integrity of the Texas judicial machine has been questioned normally due to the fact maximum JPs do not have complete information of the laws at any level, permitting anyone who involves a criminal offense who has a fundamental understanding of the law to get away with punishment within a court. Many judicial choices were devalued due to this case, which induced the entire judicial system to be wondered.
To prevent this from occurring, Texas has sought to set up necessities for the affiliation and participation of JPs in state courts, so that the best humans with efficient prison potential and know-how of local and federal legal guidelines will participate.
The most immediate cause of the Texas Revolution was the refusal of many Texas, both Anglo and Mexican, to simply accept the governmental changes mandated by "Siete Leyes" which placed nearly general power in the fingers of the Mexican national authorities and Santa Anna.
Learn more about Texas here: brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
That came from an elite, privileged background.
