Sentencing is not necessarily clear-cut. according to the text, criminal behaviors that can be attributed to stable, controllable causes appear to receive strongest punitive responses and severe sentences punishment, This is because the law tries to differentiate between the acts committed by will and self-determination, to those which are committed by situations that can not be controlled, example: it is not punished in the same way, someone that runs over a person for being under the influence of alcohol, to someone who does it because of a mechanical failure that the vehicle brought.
Answer:
B. a private good or a club good.
Explanation:
People can be prevented from using a private good or a club good because they are excludable goods.
Excludable goods or services are goods that public can be prevented from using or enjoying. On the contrary, non excludable goods are those goods and services that it is impossible to prevent the public from using/enjoying. Examples of excludable goods are private properties such as a personal phone, fish in a fish farm, the services of a gym or golf club. examples of nonexcludable goods are fish in a public river, the services of the police, a concert on a national television network.
It means "contrary to" or "opposing something". It can be used either as a prefix or as a single word. It is similar to the English word "counter".
A because it never happened
1- C
2- A
3- A
(In 1) it cant be the one that starts with C because the word before is “an”. You can get answer 1) by looking at question 2)
