1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
9

Question: Should we study history? Why or why not?

History
1 answer:
STALIN [3.7K]3 years ago
5 0
Not really because we don’t really need history in the real world you only need it if you want to teach your kids about the past or if you want to work on a history museum you have to study about history.
You might be interested in
Who was involved in the battle of stalingrad
Roman55 [17]

germant and its allies fought the soviet union

3 0
3 years ago
Is propaganda 100% True <br><br> True or False
Lady_Fox [76]
Propaganda isn't always 100% true, so your answer would be false.
4 0
3 years ago
The 2ND industrial revolution was made possible by advances in?
SSSSS [86.1K]
It was made possible by technology, travel
6 0
3 years ago
Develop four hypothesis of different ways to end the war with Japan. Be sure the suggestions are realistic and reflect the perio
Snezhnost [94]
One option can be a full military campaign based on sending soldiers to take Japanese territory. One advantage is that the number of killed civilians would be drastically lower while another would be that nuclear weaponry would not be used and would not destroy the environment. Disadvantage would be the high amount of soldier casualties and another can be possibly a very lengthy war effort.

Another option could be a complete blockade of Japan. Since it's an island, it would be possible to blockade it from all sides and wait for Japanese people to surrender since they wouldn't be able to sustain for long without importing things. One advantage would be preventing the death of Japanese civilians and preventing deaths of US troops. Disadvantages would be that might actually endure hardships and still wouldn't surrender, and another could be that they might fight like guerrillas and attack ships and American troops

Another option can be an allied assault in which the US could attack together with Soviets and split Japan like Germany. Advantage would be reduced amount of killed Japanese civilians and reduced amount of killed American troops. The disadvantage could be that a split Japan would be problematic like split Germany was because of Communism, and another could be that it would enable soviets to spread their influence even more throughout Asia

Fourth option could be having a demonstration of the power of nuclear weaponry somewhere safe. The United States could show what they are capable of in order to scare Japan into surrender. One advantage is that Japanese civilians would not be harmed and another can be that they would still show the world how strong the United States bombs are. One disadvantage could be that Japanese people might still not surrender since there were many who wanted to stay in the war even after the two nukes, and another disadvantage could be that Japan might began preparing for nuclear warfare since they would now know what awaits them

The best possible option could be as a recommendation the naval blockade. If a naval blockade was combined with bombardment of strategic military areas then Japan would inevitably surrender even though it would take a few months at least. It would cost a lot but it would save the lives of many people who didn't have to suffer because of their government.
5 0
3 years ago
Which principal weakness is in the Article of Confederation led to the creation of the Constitution
RideAnS [48]

The Articles of Confederation withheld many powers of governance from the federal government, causing it to be simply too weak. For example, the federal government could not collect taxes, which is necessary to governance. The federal government could not properly enforce laws, since any states could decide to ignore a law it didn't like. It didn't even have judicial power as the Courts weren't invented under the Articles of Confederation.

It created a federal government that was too weak to even govern.

Hope that helped.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were serfs different from peasants?
    14·2 answers
  • Which group most increased its power when the roman empire fell?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was specifically permitted by the Emancipation Proclamation?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which term refers to the members of a church that was founded by Joseph Smith, who was later succeeded by Brigham Young? A. Free
    6·2 answers
  • The commander of the northern Virginia army was
    9·2 answers
  • 5)
    6·1 answer
  • The spread of Islam into the maghrib is an example of?
    14·1 answer
  • How could economic instability produce dictatorships?
    8·2 answers
  • Describe ERTUGRUL GHAZI.
    11·1 answer
  • Think about how the crisis came to an end. Who do you think "won?" Explain.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!