1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
2 years ago
9

Can someone help me with this please?

Mathematics
1 answer:
garri49 [273]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

EASY PEASY

Step-by-step explanation:

(5x-5)=(4x+10){being corresponding angles}

solve it now by arranging like

5x-4x=10+5

done

and the second is co-interior

You might be interested in
Daniel is selecting a sock from his drawer.
Firdavs [7]

Answer:2/10

Step-by-step explanation:

2/10

7 0
3 years ago
I need the find the area of a rectangle. the length is 6.5x + 5ft and the width is 15 ft
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

Area= l+b) ×2

6.5x+5ft +5ft

13x+20ft

3 0
3 years ago
Please answer this question ONLY IF YOU KNOW THE ANSWER!! 40 points and brainliest!!
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

2/6 is the answer you are looking for.

Step-by-step explanation:

The is 1 tile that is needed and two others that aren't so you would have 1/3 which means one out of three outcomes. And you have two spins which makes you multiply the fraction by two. Giving you 2 out of 6 outcomes.

6 0
2 years ago
"Immediately after a ban on using hand-held cell phones while driving was implemented, compliance with the law was measured. A r
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

(a) Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1-p_2=0  or  p_1= p_2  

    Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1-p_2\neq 0  or  p_1\neq p_2

(b) We conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of 1,250 drivers found that 98.9% were in compliance. A year after the implementation, compliance was again measured to see if compliance was the same (or not) as previously measured.

A different random sample of 1,100 drivers found 96.9% compliance."

<em />

<em>Let </em>p_1<em> = proportion of drivers that were in compliance initially</em>

p_2<em> = proportion of drivers that were in compliance one year later</em>

(a) <u>Null Hypothesis</u>, H_0 : p_1-p_2=0  or  p_1= p_2      {means that there is not any statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

<u>Alternate Hypothesis</u>, H_A : p_1-p_2\neq 0  or  p_1\neq p_2     {means that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later}

The test statistics that will be used here is <u>Two-sample z proportion statistics</u>;

                     T.S.  = \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{ \frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2}} }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of drivers in compliance initially = 98.9%

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of drivers in compliance one year later = 96.9%

n_1 = sample of drivers initially = 1,250

n_2 = sample of drivers one year later = 1,100

(b) So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{(0.989-0.969)-(0)}{\sqrt{ \frac{0.989(1-0.989)}{1,250} + \frac{0.969(1-0.969)}{1,100}} }  

                                           =  3.33

<u>Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by;</u>

         P-value = P(Z > 3.33) = 1 - P(Z \leq 3.33)

                                            = 1 - 0.99957 = <u>0.00043</u>

Since in the question we are not given with the level of significance so we assume it to be 5%. Now at 5% significance level, the z table gives critical values between -1.96 and 1.96 for two-tailed test.

<em>Since our test statistics does not lies within the range of critical values of z, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which </em><u><em>we reject our null hypothesis.</em></u>

Therefore, we conclude that there is a statistical difference in these two proportions measured initially and then one year later.

7 0
3 years ago
Triangle Q M N is shown. The length of Q M is 18, the length of M N is 17, and the length of Q N is 20. Law of cosines: a2 = b2
kvasek [131]

Answer:

53°

Step-by-step explanation:

17² = 18² + 20² - 2(18)(20) cos Q

289 = 324 + 400 - 720 cos Q

289 = 724 - 720 cos Q

-435 = -720 cos Q

0.6042 = cos Q

cos^{-1} (0.6042) = Q

Q = 52.83

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • the sides of a rectangle are in the ratio 3:2. what is the length h of each side if the perimeter of the rectangle is 30cm?
    8·1 answer
  • Which fraction is equivalent to 63/9 ? PLS HELP!! thxs =)
    5·2 answers
  • What is the distance between 17 and 31 on a number line
    7·2 answers
  • Determine whether each number could be the probability of an event. Explain your reasoning.
    5·1 answer
  • Does anyone know what [-2/3 * (-5/7)] * (9/4) is?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me graph y = 2x - 7
    15·1 answer
  • Phineas puts $600 into a certificate of deposit that earns 3.09%. If the money is
    9·1 answer
  • A large rectangular box has a volume of 15.75 cubic feet the box is 2.5 feet long and 1.5 feet wide what is the height of the bo
    12·1 answer
  • Answer correctly and fast please.
    14·1 answer
  • Write an equation that contains points (0, 0) and is parallel to x-2y=-5
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!