The essence of the disagreement between these two superpowers was one of who had the hegemony over Europe and it was a fight between the Western countries with capitalist economies like West Germany, France, Spain, the Scandinavian countries and the sphere of the Soviet Union of the Eastern European countries like Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland etc US troops were stationed in places like West Germany to assert this fight for hegemony.
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
The Russian Revolution was a time of political and social unrest over the domain of the Russian Empire, beginning with the nullification of the government in 1917 and finishing up in 1923 with the Bolshevik foundation of the Soviet Union toward the finish of the Civil War
Causes
1. Britain had a large supply of coal and iron
2. Britain had a large population that was no longer working on farms
3. Britain had a stable government
Effects
1.Increase in Factories
2. Urbanization
3. progress in medical care
