1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
never [62]
3 years ago
8

Do you think it was moral for European

History
2 answers:
ruslelena [56]3 years ago
3 0
No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>

</span>
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It was not right for the Europeans to claim the land which was already inhabitants by the indigenous people. Before the arrival of the Europeans in the New World, Natives American were living quietly and thriving with enormous natural resources which they got accustomed. With the arrival of the European, they not only brought settlers but diseases that wiped out the entire civilizations and tribes in America. Europeans nation claimed lands for their benefits, mostly to generate wealth by exploiting natural resources.

You might be interested in
4 things that have changed since 2,500 B.C.<br> City states in Mesopotamia
12345 [234]

Answer:

As the Sumerian villages grew into large cities, they formed city-states. ... All of these things were important for the development of human civilization.planation:

5 0
2 years ago
What type of government did Russia have in ww2
Sauron [17]

Answer: In World War 2, Russia was governed by the Soviet Union or more specifically, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
President Reyes did not agree with the United States' decision to build the Panama Canal
Katarina [22]

Answer:

Because the United States offered Colombia ten million dollars, plus 250,000 dollars a year, to build the Panama canal. But the Colombian government wanted more money. And the time Panama was still a part of Colombia, but the people of Panama were planning to gain independence from Colombia, and President Reyes knew that the United States would try to help Panama have their independence.

5 0
2 years ago
Plz help me!<br> Describe Gandhi’s “nonviolence” approach to protesting. Was this method effective?
diamong [38]

Answer:

Gandhi's methodology for bringing about social transformation was more ... Although these three different approaches for fostering progress — mass protest, ... Historian Perry Anderson describes four levels of disruptive activity.

4 0
2 years ago
If prices are set higher than the
KatRina [158]

Answer:

Regardless of the cause, we see in Figure 3.6b that a price above equilibrium will result in quantity supplied being greater than quantity demanded. This excess supply is also known as a surplus.

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The three candidates in the 1856 election were?
    7·2 answers
  • What three things. must exist in order to have demand
    15·1 answer
  • Who came into power as a result of the Glorious Revolution?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the main goal of the Farmers’ Alliance?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the 17th president?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following farming practices contributed to the economic downturn? Select the two correct
    12·1 answer
  • PLZ ANSWER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE
    8·1 answer
  • In which industry was Alfred Nobel’s invention intended to be used?
    14·1 answer
  • One political consequence of religious upheaval in the period 1450 to 1750
    5·1 answer
  • How was the removal of the Chickasaw from their homelands different from the other
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!