The conqueror comes in "Landing of the Pilgrim Fathers" with the purpose of obtaining fame and wealth, and with a heart filled with ambition. The Pilgrims, however, come with a true heart filled with faith, with the purpose of worshiping God in this new land.
<h3>The conqueror and the Pilgrims</h3>
In the poem "Landing of the Pilgrim Fathers," by Felicia Dorothea Hemans, the speaker contrasts the way the conqueror comes to the New World with the way the Pilgrims do the same. To contrast two things, their differences must be pointed out.
The conqueror is usually a violent character. He comes from Europe with the purpose of taking, of colonizing. Therefore, he is ambitious, and his objective is to obtain fame and wealth.
On the other hand, the Pilgrims are "true-hearted," and ambition is far from their intentions. They search for a new place to worship God, to establish their faith.
Learn more about the Pilgrims here:
brainly.com/question/1788552
The correct answer is B because with B.C. its all capitals and A.D. is the same so with time you need to add periods after the letters of A.D. and B.C. and are all capital
Knights were supposed to be gallant and polite at all times, so making an an offer to a king had to be done appropriately, because a lot of things were at stake. A knight had to know where he belonged and to act appropriately.
Answer:
The best effective thesis statements are both the first ("Hollembeak's review of the high school's play is fun and entertaining to read") and third ("In her editorial, Mellie writes convincingly of the need for high school classes to begin later in the morning") options.
Explanation:
The first and third statements are the only ones which state a convincing thesis about an argument. Both of them are informative about what is the object argued and present a clear idea of the main point made on that. Second option does not apply to the question because it is lacking in some way, because though it is informative and sets an idea of the argument, it is very broad to state "the play's action [is] in the 21st century". Fourth option does apply to the question as well because it is not a thesis, that is just exploring the content of an argument made, clarifying ideas for readers. And fifth option does not apply to the question too, because it is not a thesis, that is just a description of an information previously given, it only characterizes an informative statement, not an effective thesis.
Answer:
Winds, trees, leveled houses
Explanation:
