When you compare a source like Wikipedia to two other authoritative academic sources, you are finding the differences between your sources
Answer:
Explanation:
I wouldn't get better grades, if I studied more.
We would win more games, if we practiced soccer more.
If I did my homework more quickly, I would have more time to watch TV.
If Jenny lost her rabbit's foot, she would have good luck.
This question is about the article "Choosing a Warning Label for Human DNA"
Answer and Explanation:
The author presents two types of optimists regarding how other planets and other species would receive samples that would promote the existence of human beings on these planets.
One of the optimists says that it would be necessary to inform the "extraterrestrials" that they received our species, that we are highly dangerous, invasive and that we have a strong potential for destruction. This optimist believes that this would place us as great warriors and necessary beings when problems arise.
However, another type of optimist, prefers to show our sense of community, our delicacy, sentimentality and kindness. Showing our hosts that we are complex beings, but capable of loving and being loved.
In view of this reading, we can see that the author fits into the second group of optimists, because he stimulated our most intimate nature, showing that if it is stimulated, it can overcome our negative points.
<span>that statement is false Prospero is the fictional character in the tempest by William Shakespeare who held the status as the rightful duke of Milan.
His first appearance was at a cloven pine when he freed the entrapped Ariel (happened before the play begun)</span>
Millicent would rather do a difficult thing she believes is right than the easy thing.
