1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anton [14]
2 years ago
5

Can law enforcement agencies solve or combat crime on their own?​

Law
1 answer:
Jet001 [13]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Cos they have been bestowed with the power by the Government of their country and also they have enough financial fund and weapons to be able to combat crime

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
levacccp [35]
Answer:
B: Wayned a high school dropout
Hope this help
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why study crime and criminal justice?
Soloha48 [4]
To learn how crime affects society
5 0
2 years ago
Explain why Article I of the Constitution prevents a president of the United States from enacting a federal budget on his or her
ELEN [110]

Answer:

This is to ensure that there are enough checks and balances in the system to prevent the country’s decisions from being solely taken by just an individual in order to prevent mismanagement of public funds.

Explanation:

In the Article I of the US Constitution there is a provision that prevents the president from enacting a federal budget on his or her own, without the consent of other branches of the federal government.

This is to ensure financial accountability and prevent the high risk of misappropriation of funds if the President had the sole power to do so.

4 0
3 years ago
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
During the 1950s all states used what type of sentencing?
Pani-rosa [81]
Rehabilitation of offenders replaced punishment as the penal system's primary objective.
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 8) In general,
    6·1 answer
  • The W-2 form is a form that tells you _______.
    8·1 answer
  • What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof of
    14·1 answer
  • Question 3
    6·1 answer
  • Please tell me the answer to 60+9
    14·2 answers
  • All crimes must first be tried by which entity?
    10·2 answers
  • As advanced technology becomes more and more common, what procedures might police need to develop for interacting with smart hom
    10·2 answers
  • Citizenship as a right that is materialised through active participation
    14·1 answer
  • The English law which first acknowledged the surpremacy of law over the ruler was the​
    8·1 answer
  • Person's motor skills are
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!