1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WINSTONCH [101]
2 years ago
11

I NEED HELP WITH THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!

Law
1 answer:
crimeas [40]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: The in general government assess framework is progressive, with add up to government assess burdens a bigger rate of salary for higher-income family units than for lower-income family units. A few government charges are backward, as they make up a bigger rate of wage for lower-income than for higher-income families.

Source: taxpolicycenter.org

You might be interested in
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is living on credit both dangerous to you personally and dangerous to the country?​
worty [1.4K]
Honestly it’s not dangerous to live on credit unless you DON’T PAY YOUR BILLS because with cash you have a higher chance of your money being lost or stolen, and with debit you can only pay exactly what you have in your account penny for penny, but with credit you can over spend a little on Thursday if your pay check comes tomorrow.

Please mark brainliest
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are renewables attractive to governments
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

This question does not make sense. Could you please provide more information, then i will be able to help you with your question. Thanks.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Facts of the case
netineya [11]

Answer:

I believe that someone could argue xenophobia in that case. Because not all people of a nation are going to be bad or want revenge,  I think that since he was a decedent that he shouldn't have been penalized Because he never made a threat or showed any signs of danger to anyone.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not one of the support disciplines generally provided individuals incarcerated in a correctional facil
ella [17]

Answer:

the last one

Explanation:

i searched it and it's the last one hope it helps

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • There are 24 Republican and 10 Democratic Senators up for reelection this year. Seven Republicans will be fighting to hold onto
    11·1 answer
  • The vehicle code includes regulations regarding?
    15·2 answers
  • Ronald Rawls and Zabian Bailey were in an auto accident in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Bailey rear-ended Rawls at a stoplight. The
    15·1 answer
  • Is it unethical for the nonprofit museum to imply that a price must be paid when it really is a donation?
    11·1 answer
  • When can omission satisfy the actual of accomplice liability
    14·1 answer
  • Si unit brings uniformity in measurement throughout the world. give reason​
    12·1 answer
  • What five amendments deal with the presidency and presidential elections?​
    8·1 answer
  • 2. Which partner is often the first to arrive and last to leave the incident site of a disaster?
    11·1 answer
  • 2. Share an example of a case where you
    10·1 answer
  • _____ means that laws must be applied fairly and equally to all people, especially to a citizen accused of a crime.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!