1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
WINSTONCH [101]
2 years ago
11

I NEED HELP WITH THIS ASAP PLEASE!!!

Law
1 answer:
crimeas [40]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: The in general government assess framework is progressive, with add up to government assess burdens a bigger rate of salary for higher-income family units than for lower-income family units. A few government charges are backward, as they make up a bigger rate of wage for lower-income than for higher-income families.

Source: taxpolicycenter.org

You might be interested in
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Who has chegg please answer i need answers​
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

What?

I need answers

5 0
3 years ago
For each principle, describe how the Constitution protects this idea.
jekas [21]

Answer:

Do you still need this answer?

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How is a person's legal standing defined by law?
Shalnov [3]
<h3>In law, standing or locus standi is a condition that a party seeking a legal remedy must show they have by demonstrating to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case.</h3>
3 0
3 years ago
What are the various clues that flames and smoke can offer the investigator in the arson investigation
lesantik [10]

Answer:

if they're warm or cold burns/embers

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The
    9·1 answer
  • What did Supreme Court decisions incorporating the Bill of Rights mean?
    12·2 answers
  • 8. What is the process of identifying psychological and social characteristics surrounding the crime as well as the manner in wh
    15·2 answers
  • Hank is a computer forensics specialist. Upon arriving at a crime scene, what is his first task?
    13·2 answers
  • 2. Symptoms and complications of
    15·1 answer
  • This road sign means
    7·2 answers
  • On April 16, 1982, at 10 pm Ray Johnson and his eight-year-old son David were waiting for a "walk" signal before crossing a stre
    7·2 answers
  • If a 10-Year Term Life policy contains a Renewability provision, the policy will renew
    14·1 answer
  • Do police have to tell you why you are being detained?
    10·2 answers
  • What did Karl Marx say about command economy?.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!