The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"
I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.
For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.
Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
Answer:
I feel like its A
Explanation:
Im sorry if im wrong but my gut is telling me A because domestic violence around the world increases the chances of physical abuse.
The judiciary is the one that has the authority to declare the initiative as unconstitutional.
<h3>What is the role of the judiciary?</h3>
- Organize and monitor the justice of each state.
- Monitor compliance with the laws contained in the federal and state constitution.
- Supervise the legislative and executive powers.
- Guarantee collective and individual rights.
- Apply laws.
An initiative is considered unconstitutional when the judiciary considers it contrary to the concepts adopted by the federal and state constitutions.
In that case, the judiciary must prevent controversial attitudes to the laws of a country from being exercised, in order to guarantee the security of the people. This function of the judiciary must be supervised by the legislative branch, which makes the laws present in the federal or state constitution, and by the executive branch, which certifies compliance with these laws.
Learn more about the judiciary:
brainly.com/question/14305259
#SPJ1
Answer:
i dont know hmhmhm
Explanation:
definitely about law. you might needs this info to prove someone guilty in the future
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems that you miss the question. Here we just have a statement.
What is your question? What do you want to know?
If this is a true or false question the answer is "true."
It is true that the federal reserve is not federal, or a reserve but a private collective that can't be stopped from its power.
The reason why is that id does not belong to the federal government. Indeed it is private and is one of the issues that has always concerned the American people. It is managed and operated by the private sector that has always supported private banks and huge financial institutions that heavily influence US economic and political decisions.
The Federal Reserve or commonly known as the Fed is the Central bank of the United States. In a close work relationship with the US Treasury Department, they pay close attention to the financial system of the country. The Fed and the Treasury Department decide on how much money needs to be printed each year based on the demand expected, the money that is going to be destroyed, and the inventory that exists in the banks.
