1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
malfutka [58]
3 years ago
10

Pls help me i need it

History
1 answer:
mixas84 [53]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is D, the allies ability to produce enough supplies to fight the war
You might be interested in
How can trauma impact generations of people ?​
Nina [5.8K]
Because of the behavior and activities the person caused for the person to have traumas which leads to new generations because of maybe learning from their experiences, etc.
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
How did Anglo-American settlers in Texas see themselves? Did they adopt a Mexican identity because they were living in Mexican t
guajiro [1.7K]

Answer:

Anglo-Americans never considerate themselves as part of the Mexican government.

Explanation:

Texas settled by Mexican farmers and ranchers after it got independence from Spanish colonial power in 1821. Settlers began farming and ranching in Texas as the land was available at a reasonable price. Settlers in Texas dealt with buying land and raising cattle and livestock. The Mexican government invited Anglo-Americans for the development of regions as it remains unoccupied. Anglo- Americans migrated to Texas in the 1820s to get cheap farmland. They always saw themselves as part of America even though they received land and rights in Texas under the Mexican government. They resented Mexican laws and never adopted any Mexican identity while living in Mexican territory as they always saw Mexicans was contradictory and thought them as shallow and lazy.

4 0
3 years ago
10. Which of the following were not social issues affecting minorities/immigrants?
alisha [4.7K]

Answer:

Not A

Not B

Not C

Definitely D for the reason that they weren't given all their freedoms that the citizens had. A lot of people opposed immigrants and minorities back then, some still do and it's saddening.

3 0
3 years ago
The Articles of Confederation was the basis of the first government of the United States, but it contained some glaring weakness
romanna [79]
1-didn't give power to tax so the nation had trouble raising money for their debts
2-Couldnt send military or officials to stop rebellions like shay's rebellion
3-Overall limited the power of the government and stopped them from regulating the nation to it's best
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What do blue signs indicate In transit
    10·1 answer
  • Which early labor union is being described below? started in 1869, by uriah s. stephens, this was one of the first relatively pe
    14·2 answers
  • What divided the New England Mid Atlantic in southern colonies into three <br> separate regions
    14·1 answer
  • When the American Revolution came to an official end in 1783, how did white elites in Saint Domingue feel about the outcome of t
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the French believe that the Ohio River valley was their territory
    12·1 answer
  • What country was not involved in the age of European exploration
    11·1 answer
  • Use the following image to answer the question.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the nineteenth-century industrial workplace?
    8·1 answer
  • What Native American Group was culture centered on building large dome shaped homes
    10·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!