They sculpted
molded
made pottery and much more
The correct answer is: "schools must desegregate schools must integrate"
Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark decision issued by the US Supreme Court in 1954, which declared segregation to be unconstitutional and overturned the decision formerly reached in Plessy v. Ferguson. It was considered a major victory connected to the Civil Rights Movement.
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landarmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896 which allowed segregation in public schools, declaring that it did not violate the Equal Protection Clause, guaranteed by the Reconstruction amendments to the US Constitution (14th and 15th), as long as the facilities provided for black and white students were equal in terms of quality. Segregation was not unconstitutional, as long as the "separate but equal" criteria was fulfilled.
There were many laws passed during the Tokugawa period which lasted from 1600 to 1868. The most important laws during this period would probably be "sankin kotai" and "Buke shohatto". "Senkin kotai" refers to the law that all of the daimyo, that is feudal lords, have to spend a certain amount of time every other year in Edo, the capital, away from their provinces. Their wives and heirs would remain in Edo as some sort of political hostages. This was a way for the shoguns to maintain control over the feudal lords. In 1862 this law was relaxed somewhat. The "Buke shohatto" were laws for various warrior houses for feudal lords and the samurai aristocracy.They were also sees as edicts which described the honorable and proper behavior for daimyo.
To answer your first question, there are a lot of positive things about South Africa since the end of Apartheid. The most obvious being that races from all colors have access to better education and have an equal chance at getting work. There has been massive spending on infrastructure, making South Africa the most developed country on the African continent, including the building of speed trains, upgrading of airports, freeways, and hundreds of thousands of new homes for previously disadvantaged communities. The country went through an economic boom period since 2000, and because of good economic policies that govern our banks, South Africa did not suffer as badly as Europe or the US during the recession of 2008-2009, although there were also a lot of jobs lost.
<span>For the second question.</span>
<span>There are many, reasons why there are still problems 15 years after Apartheid. You have to keep in mind that there was a lot of damage done during the 40 years of apartheid, because of the separate development of black communities and white communities. But the country shows signs of improvement. Crime is one of our main concerns and especially aggravated crime. Although it does not affect tourists as much. The biggest reasons that there are still problems, is problems that are true for all African countries, and that is corrupt leaders that can't keep their hands out of the cookie jar (meaning that they only making themselves rich from taxpayers money, instead of delivering services). The other reason is the communist mentality of a lot of leaders. There are not enough taxpayers to cater for all the unemployed people. But like I said, there are many, many reasons</span>
<span>For the third ones.</span>
<span>I think the US should pay attention to what happens in South Africa, to pressure South African leaders not to follow corrupt policies. </span>
For the last one.
<span>The legacy of racism in the US has a lot of similarities, but also a lot of differences. Remember that in South Africa, it was a minority government that used violence, intimidation to suppress a majority. It was also during the Cold War, and the South African government was against the communist policies of the black politicians. </span>
<span>In the US, it was a white majority government that used to suppress a minority, but usually through exclusion and discrimination. Unfortunately, racism is prevalent all over the world, especially in Australia, Germany, and Britain.
</span>That's the end of my very long answer.
The Statement is Absolutely True.
<h3><u>What are organizations for social change?</u></h3>
- The most common definition of a social change organization is one that deals with the systemic, underlying causes of social (political, cultural, and economic) disparities in an effort to address both those inequalities as well as the underlying issues and situations that give rise to them.
<h3><u>Which societal change best exemplifies this?</u></h3>
- The industrial revolution, the end of slavery, and the feminist movement are a few examples of important societal transformations that had a lasting impact.
- Sociologists of today easily recognise the critical part social movements play in motivating society's disgruntled citizens to effect social change.
To learn more about Social Change Organisations, Click the links.
brainly.com/question/1008097
brainly.com/question/974921
#SPJ4
