According to the context, the purpose of the double asterisks is to indicate additional information at the end of the document.
<h3>What is the purpose of the double asterisks?</h3>
It is mainly used to make indications or calls about a word within a text.
That is, it allows a text to be quoted in some document, in this way, it is usually placed in the margins or footer, giving the information corresponding to the case.
Therefore, we can conclude that according to the context, the purpose of the double asterisks is to indicate additional information at the end of the document.
Learn more about double asterisks here: brainly.com/question/16613683
#SPJ4
according to the book logically we are told that the book title Frankenstein is not named after the "monster" but rather the scientist because of his sir name. that's knowledge.
Wisdom on the other hand, correlates to Frankenstein being a monster because he is afraid of what he has created and treats his creation cruelly and bitterly without a chance of redemption for his creation to be treated kindly when initially the creation just wanted to be valid in the eyes of his creator, thus feeling a need for vengeance and justice for itself and feeling as though Frankenstein deserved to pay through pain and suffering the creation itself felt. In a sense, Frakenstein deserves everything the creation had done to him because the creation felt like he was abused. because of Frankenstein's early ignorant actions and consequences of playing god he cars not only himself but his creation much suffering and that's why he is a monster of poor moral conduct.
Answer:
A and C
Without a quick solution to the wildfire, we citizens may be in trouble
We do not need a solution right away, since two days is plenty of time to solve global food insecurity.
Explanation:
i'm not quite sure if this is correct because i couldn't find much on what the answer is but i think C is for sure correct
The supreme court decision in Plessy Vs Ferguson is unconstitutional because THE SUPREME COURT RULING ALLOWED STATES TO DENY EQUAL PROTECTION TO ANY PERSON WITHIN ITS JURIDICTION.
The supreme court ruling which upholds the segregational law of the state of Louisiana is considered unconstitutional because it acts contrary to both the 13th amendment, which abolished slavery and 14th amendment, which prohibit some restrictive legislation on the part of the state.
