Answer:
because since china is over populated there is a 1 child only policy so that is one reason
Answer:
Battle of Hampton Roads, or popularly known as the Battle of Merrimac v. Monitor.
Explanation:
The Battle of Hampton Roads pitted the ironclads of both the North and South against each other, while the North was naval besieging the ports of the South to keep them from receiving foreign aids and from trading. Neither side technically won, as the Union lost some wooden ships, while the blockade was kept up.
~
We cant help you if you dont show the map
Hello,
Upon reading, it seems the question is asking what the charge would be, in this case it would have to be C, civil court as breach of contract. The plaintiff didn't abide by the contract(if there was one), and the charges are his defense against the breach of contract charge. He was there to do a job and never completed it. The only problem with this is, we do not know if the plaintiff signed a contract with the defendant or not. [ If he did then it all depends on what the contract said and if he met those goals.] Most likely however this would appear in a civil court as a breach of contract.
That phrase works perfectly! Although if you’d prefer a phrase that rhymes, Join the war and fight off shore might work (idk)
Otherwise, this works perfectly with your poster and would help express the symbolism you’ve provided!
Good luck and your poster looks rest so far!
