Melanie said:
Every angle bisector in a triangle bisects the opposite side perpendicularly.
A 'counterexample' would show an angle bisector in a triangle that DOESN'T
bisect the opposite side perpendicularly.
See my attached drawing of a counterexample.
Both of the triangles that Melanie examined have
equal sides on both sides
of the angle bisector. That's the only way that the angle bisector can bisect
the opposite side perpendicularly. Melanie didn't examine enough different
triangles.
100 x 20 = 2000
Explanation
100
X
20
——
2000
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
The definition of a rational number is a number that can be represented as a fraction. Since 56/7 is a fraction it must be a rational number. An irrational number is a number that cannot be represented as a fraction because it never ends and repeats without a pattern forever. An example of this is pi because pi can never exactly be represented as a fraction.
Answer:
m∠z = 106°
Step-by-step explanation:
From the figure attached,
By exterior angle theorem,
m∠z = a + 68°
By linear pair theorem,
m∠a + 142° = 180°
m∠a = 180° - 142°
= 38°
Therefore, m∠z = 38° + 68°
= 106°
Answer:1.) m∠A +m∠B +m∠C = (sum of angles in a triangle △)
2.) 24° + x + m∠C = 180°
3.) x = 156° - m∠C
Step-by-step explanation:
1. m∠A +m∠B +m∠C = (sum of angles in a triangle △)
2. 28°+x−4° + ______ = 180°
24° + x + m∠C = 180°
3) x = 180° - 24° - m∠C
x = 156° - m∠C