Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Simplify 3 ratical- 1000
Answer:
f(x) > -x + 2
Step-by-step explanation:
First I found the equation of the line.
The y intercept is at 2 so I know to add 2 at the end
The slope is -1 since it is going downwards
Since the top side is shaded, that represents greater than, if it was shaded downwards, it would be less than
Putting all that together, the equation is f(x) > -x + 2
Answer:
(x+y)
Step-by-step explanation:
Thus, the HCF is (x+y).
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Exactly 29.7, but you can't have 7/10 of a student so you round to 30. So 30 students are playing a music instrument because 330 times 0.09 is about 30
