<span>The farmer is better off being a farmer. After 1 year the farmer will have made 900,000 off of 300,000 baskets. Minus the lease of land and payment of workers, the farmer will have over 650,000. Leave that in the bank and do it another year, interest at 22% would net around 147,000. Add that to 650kx2. That equals a little over 1.4 million. So in closing, farmer is more lucrative than shoe salesman.</span>
Answer:
Explanation: More than the 4Ps or simply social media, Boundaryless Marketing refers to what marketing should always be about: connecting with customers, understanding fina… ... Assistant Director, Global Brand, Marketing and Communications
Answer:$192.200
Explanation: sales revenue ($135 × 6,200) ................................................. $837,000 Variable cost: .......................................................................... Direct materials ($49 × 6,200) ........................................... $303,800 Direct labor ($38 × 6,200) .................................................. 235,000 Variable manufacturing overhead ($6 × 6,200) .................. 37,200 Variable selling and administrative ($11 × 6,200) ............. 68,200 644,800 Contribution margin ............................................................... $192,200
Answer:
If Jeff's wage rate rises, he decides to work more hours. From this, we can infer that for Jeff, the substitution effect is greater than the income effect - option C.
Explanation:
The substitution effect is stronger than the income effect in a case whereby the supply of labor increases as the wage rate increases .
On the other hand, when the supply of labor decreases as the wage rate increases, then the income effect is stronger than the substitution effect.
With regards to the scenario given in the question - with an increase in the wage rate, Jeff has decided to work more hours.
Thus, in the given case, it can be inferred that for Jeff, the substitution effect is greater than the income effect.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.
