Answer:
1 and 2/15
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is 7/8. when converted into decimal , it becomes 0.8 something which is greater than all and so farthest from 0
Answer:
yep
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>I am a CHICKEN NUGGETS WADDLE WADDLE</h2>
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
it is a a rhombus......... parallelogram is also called as a rhombus....
