1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANEK [815]
3 years ago
7

Describe the governments in Mexico and Central America.

History
1 answer:
olga2289 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

the politics of Mexico did take place in a framework of the federal presidential representative Democratic republic whose government is based on a congressional system whereby the president in of Mexico is the head of state and head of government of a multi-party system the . Central America itself does not have a government pa se ,given that it is it is original in the South or North of America rather than sorveing country's many of the current countries of Central Africa America did form their own country in 1823 shortly after the in having independence from Spain

You might be interested in
What is the difference between the Grand Council and the common house of assembly?
givi [52]

Answer:

one is where people talk about important things the other is where people go to get new updates

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!
iren [92.7K]

Answer:

I would start by making billboards then making ads for people to know and then start working on peace with other people to get my country out there

7 0
3 years ago
Great Britain and France avoided a take over by fascist by
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

Great Britain and France avoid a take over by fascists' by restricting freedom of speech.

Explanation:

Fascism is a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc. , and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.  

How Britain and France avoided fascist revolution inside their own country during rise of fascism in Italy and Germany?

What made Mussolini’s Fascism, and Lenin’s Communism too, was a specific and unique situation, never to be repeated in later history: namely, the presence of enormous masses of disaffected veterans, with recent experience of war at a very high technical level of skill, and angry about the condition of their country. (And of enormous amounts of weapons.) Fascism was not made by speeches or by money, but by tens of thousands of men gathering in armed bands to beat up enemies. And that being the case, what happened to the similar masses of veterans who came home to France, Britain, and America too, after 1918?

Well, France was exhausted. She had fought with her full strength from day one, whereas Britain had taken time to deploy its whole strength, and America and Italy had only entered the war much later. For five years, every man who could be spared had been at the Front. Her losses were larger in proportion than those of any other great power. And on the positive side, France, like Britain and America, was prosperous. The veterans went home to a country that was comparatively able to receive them, give them a place to be, and not foster any dangerous mass disaffection. This is of course relatively speaking. There will have been anger enough, irritation enough, even some disaffection. But the only real case of violence from below due to disaffection was the riot in Paris that followed the Stavisky affair in early 1934, and that, compared to what took place daily in other countries, was a very bad play of a riot.

ON the other hand, both America and Britain experienced situations that had more than a taste of Fascism, but that failed to develop into freedom-destroying movements. In America, Fascism could have come from above. The last few years of the Wilson administration were horrendous: the Red Scare fanaticized large strata of the population, and the hatred came from the top, from Wilson and his terrible AG Palmer. (Palmer was a Quaker. So was Richard Nixon. Is there a reason why Quakers in politics should prove particularly dangerous?) Hate and fear of “reds” was also the driving force of Italian Fascism; and Wilson and Palmer mobilized it in ways and with goals that Mussolini would have understood. Had Wilson not suffered his famous collapse, he might have been a real danger: he intended to run for a third term in office. And the nationwide spread of the new KKK, well beyond the bounds of the old South, shows that he might have found a pool of willing stormtroopers. Altogether, I think America dodged a bullet the size of a Gatling shot when Wilson collapsed in office.

Britain’s own Blackshirt moment took place in Ireland. Sociologically, culturally, psychologically, the Blacks and Tans were the Blackshirts of Britain - masses of disaffected veterans sent into the streets to harass and terrify political enemies, bullies in non-standard uniforms with a loose relationship with the authorities. Only, their relationship with public opinion developed in an exactly opposite direction. Whereas Italy’s majority, horrified by Socialist violence at home and by Communist brutality abroad, tended increasingly to excuse the Blackshirts and wink at their violence, in Britain - possibly because of the influence of the American media, which were largely against British rule in Ireland - the paramilitary force found itself increasingly isolated from the country’s mainstream, and eventually their evil reputation became an asset to their own enemies and contributed to British acceptance of Irish independence.

Thanks,
Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
How did the french women try to change their role in french society in the late 1800's
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Historians since the late 20th century have debated how women shared in the French Revolution and what long-term impact it had on French women. Women had no political rights in pre-Revolutionary France; they were considered "passive" citizens, forced to rely on men to determine what was best for them. That changed dramatically in theory as there seemingly were great advances in feminism. Feminism emerged in Paris as part of a broad demand for social and political reform. The women demanded equality to men and then moved on to a demand for the end of male domination. Their chief vehicle for agitation were pamphlets and women's clubs, especially the Society of Revolutionary Republican Women. However, the Jacobin (radical) element in power abolished all the women's clubs in October 1793 and arrested their leaders. The movement was crushed. Devance explains the decision in terms of the emphasis on masculinity in wartime, Marie Antoinette's bad reputation for feminine interference in state affairs, and traditional male supremacy.[1] A decade later the Napoleonic Code confirmed and perpetuated women's second-class status.[2]

8 0
3 years ago
What's ur favorite color?<br><br>fr33 points :))))) have a great day or night
katrin2010 [14]

Answer: turquoise :D

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which Greek city-state was particularly vocal supporter of the rebellion against Persia
    14·1 answer
  • 15. Iced tea costs $2.75 a quart. Mrs. Lopez bought 2 gallons for a family reunion. How
    6·1 answer
  • The United States was primarily a _______ Society in the 1700s growing food and raising animals since Great Britain refuse to al
    9·1 answer
  • What might this signature indicate about charlemagne's personal beliefs?1. he made latin the language of law.2. he was an avowed
    11·1 answer
  • Coffe and sugar from Brazil are examples of?
    9·1 answer
  • The amount of money that is required for an accused person to await their trial outside of a prison cell is called __________. I
    7·2 answers
  • Chinese people accepted the Zhou rulers who took over from the Shang because they ____.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a cause of tension between the United States and Britain that would eventually lead to the War of
    14·1 answer
  • Who wanted Hawaii to join the U.S.: Native Hawaiians or the "Dole Government?”
    12·1 answer
  • What can you do to make someone or something look bad in propaganda? Give three examples from either the previous example image
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!