George McDuffie is a South Carolina governor on 1834 to 1836. On his 1835 speech regarding slavery and explained why slavery must not be ruled out in two points: (1) his racial argument is that African-Americans are born to be slaves because of their physical attributes which was evidently shown with their skins. He said that it is useless to gain power if you have an inferior skin; and (2) his religious argument is that God decided to make African-American slaves when he created them and that there is nothing they can do about it.
Answer:
multicultural Sunni Islamic state
Explanation:
Under Suleiman the Great, the Ottoman Empire grew larger and stronger, incorporating new territories in its borders, thus new groups of people as well. This resulted in an empire that had an abundance of different cultures and religions in its borders. The Sunni Islam was the state religion and it was set up higher in the hierarchy than the rest, but the empire had multiple others, including Orthodox Christian, Catholic, Armenian Christian, Jews. This made the empire a multicultural empire, though it has to be mentioned that the multiculturalism did not work well in this case, as the people of different cultures, ethnic groups, or religions were constantly rebelling against the suppressing Ottomans.
Syria's government is unitary rupublic
Answer:
<h2>North</h2><h3> Strength </h3>
- The North had an enormous industrial advantage
- the North manufactured 97 percent of the country's firearms
Weakness
- . They did not know the land the other side were fighting on the defensive in its own territory and were familiar with the landscape
<h2>
South</h2>
Weakness
- At the beginning of the war, the Confederacy had only one-ninth the industrial capacity of the Union.
- There was not even one rifle works in the entire South
<h3> Strength</h3>
- The South could produce all the food it needed
- The South also had a great nucleus of TRAINED OFFICERS. Seven of the eight military colleges in the country were in the South.
<em>Hi There!!</em>
<em>I think the answer is </em><em>False</em><em>.</em>
<em>Because, I think there was that it was an indirect tax that was hard to protest. related to molasses, which was an everyday item. only required traders to pay the new tax. was an example of taxation without representation.</em>
<em>P.S </em><em>Tell me if this is wrong...</em>

<em>#</em>
<em> </em>
<em># </em>
<em> </em>

ヾ(•ω•`)o