Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
Long term hunting has led to following
a) Reduction in population size and hence the gene pool
b) Causation of Bottleneck effect
Due to above factors, the remaining population of Northern elephant seals does not represent the original genetic problem.
Due to this restriction in mating and genetic variation shall prevail pertaining to reduced gene pool.
Due to continuous hunting, the gene pool will further shrink, leading to genetic similarity among the organism
Option C is correct
Resulting factors are called Second-order factors
<h3>
What is factor analysis?</h3>
- Factor analysis is a statistical approach for describing variability in seen, correlated variables in terms of a possibly smaller number of unobserved variables known as factors.
- It is possible, for example, that fluctuations in six known variables mostly reflect variations in two unseen (underlying) variables.
- Factor analysis looks for such joint fluctuations in response to latent variables that are not noticed.
- Factor analysis may be regarded of as a specific form of errors-in-variables models since the observed variables are described as linear combinations of the possible factors plus "error" terms.
- It may help to deal with data sets where there are large numbers of observed variables that are thought to reflect a smaller number of underlying/latent variables.
- It is one of the most commonly used inter-dependency techniques and is used when the relevant set of variables shows a systematic inter-dependence and the objective is to find out the latent factors that create a commonality.
To Learn more about factor analysis from the given link
brainly.com/question/26561565
#SPJ4
Answer:
Losses due to microbial contamination of hatching eggs in the poultry industry can run into millions of Euros. Fumigation with formaldehyde gas is an effective way of disinfection before and during incubation as well as near hatching. In addition, formaldehyde is also hazardous to human health.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!!!
Forever friend and helper,
Cammie:)
One option is that the samples run through gel electrophoresis is too small to be recognized (shorter strands of DNA travel further through the gel and larger strands travel shorter). The other option in that the restriction enzyme did not cut the DNA in the proper spot or there was a mutation in the bases that allowed for a mistake in the cutting; that is why there are 800 base pairs in one sample (that's a lot) An example of a mutation is that lets say the restriction enzyme was supposed to cut at the second G in GGACC. But if that G was turned into an A, then the restriction enzyme wouldn't cut there.
For number 5, you might have 800 because of the restriction enzyme cutting it wrong, a mutation that allowed for the cutting to not take place, or a fault in the sample taking.
I am an AP Biology student right now in Wisconsin. I just finished that worksheet this morning :) anymore questions just hit me up
C
Explanation:
I think it's c if not then d
